Threat Intelligence Essay Example For Students

Threat Intelligence Essay Menace Intelligence We will write a custom essay on Threat Intelligence specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now Introduction Cyber-attacks have dramatically increased in badness and frequence in recent old ages, taking to major security breaches and 100s of 1000000s of customers’ informations going compromised worldwide. To run within this of all time germinating planetary menace environment, organisations must maturate their traditional security schemes to an Intelligence-Based Security Framework, besides normally referred to as Threat Intelligence. Rather than responding to qui vives of onslaughts, Intelligence-Based Security enables you to proactively place menaces against your organisation and fade out them before an onslaught has been launched. Menace Intelligence are experts in the country of Intelligence-Based Threat and Risk Management, and is backed up by their first security research and huge sum of specialist security experience across a broad scope of industries. Current state of affairs Incidents on advanced relentless menaces and DDOS are rumored virtually every hebdomad and therefore the impact of those onslaughts are huge. These incidents merely evade the traditional margin security. Anti-malware merchandise have evolved that do nt see the better-known signatures nevertheless build usage of alternate manners of sensing to corroborate web end points, application and information will remain secure. Some of the challenges with regard to the germinating landscape that endeavors are confronting are: The gait at which signature-based malware is germinating is non fiting the velocity at which menaces are germinating The big database incorporating the signature inside informations affects the public presentation and doesn’t work good for unpredictable menaces The onslaughts are uninterrupted and are extremely targeted, which makes them hard to observe It has non merely affected the fiscal industry, but a figure of other industries. Menace intelligence Gartner defines menace intelligence as â€Å"Evidence-based cognition, including context, mechanisms, indexs, deductions and actionable advice, about an bing or emerging threat or jeopardy to assets that can be used to inform determinations sing the topic s response to that threat or hazard.† Menace intelligence will move as a figure and furnish correct, seasonably and careful info to security directors. These will ease in early sensing and saloon of onslaughts thereby cut downing losingss. Today, menace intelligence services have matured to tie in extent wherever the information feeds watchful sing the possible menaces. Threat intelligence forms a part of all the exposure direction, security event direction and specialised menace analysis and protection ware. The ecosystem can be divided into three wide units: aggregation and analysis, determination support and response. It involves collection and analysing informations provenders that helps in making choices and to necessitate stairss to extenuate the menaces signaled by the qui vives. Each of those units have to be compelled to add concert so as to carry through or transcend the gait of germinating menaces. This menace intelligence capableness enables organisations to spy and answer to possible menaces and exposures therefore to rarefy the onslaught window and besides the bound the clip to entree. Organizations that adopt this attack is awake to the existent fact that menace intelligence is that the foundation of investings created and risk appraisal. Menace Intelligence Cycle For organisations trusting on manual procedures, the stairss to operationalizing the intelligence gathered are: Gather informations from different beginnings in a assortment of formats. Most of these informations gathered are in signifier of menace indexs The following measure is to analyse the information. The analyst should formalize the information gathered and so construct the context consequently Following measure is to feed the validated information into controls Figure 1: Menace Intelligence Cycle Menace Intelligence Challenges and Measures While the importance of menace intelligence is accepted and is taken into history to be the inspiration piece of cyber-security by many houses, the employment of the information gathered is ad-hoc in many. Persons are trapped in conformity check-boxes and do nt supply specialise menace intelligence services Many organisations accept pattern lucifers and besides the intelligence databases, which became uneffective and disused. New targeted onslaughts and besides the usage viruses benefit of those disused ways and non up-to-date databases. Although several houses do nt portion knowledge attributable to competitory grounds, effectual coaction and crowd-sourcing will ease physique, act rapidly and revoke invasions Operationalizing menace intelligence is the biggest challenge in leveraging menace intelligence. There is deficit of menace beginnings and organisations consider really data gathered to be signifier of intelligence Some organisations can’t trade with incompatibilities that occur due to difference in informations quality. For informations to be utile, it has to be relevant to the organisation Datas received from external parties aren’t validated and all of them is considered as menace intelligence. Most houses accept the informations they receive and do non hold resources to formalize it .ua917a429bfcdcf8e1810275806be6826 , .ua917a429bfcdcf8e1810275806be6826 .postImageUrl , .ua917a429bfcdcf8e1810275806be6826 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ua917a429bfcdcf8e1810275806be6826 , .ua917a429bfcdcf8e1810275806be6826:hover , .ua917a429bfcdcf8e1810275806be6826:visited , .ua917a429bfcdcf8e1810275806be6826:active { border:0!important; } .ua917a429bfcdcf8e1810275806be6826 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ua917a429bfcdcf8e1810275806be6826 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ua917a429bfcdcf8e1810275806be6826:active , .ua917a429bfcdcf8e1810275806be6826:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ua917a429bfcdcf8e1810275806be6826 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ua917a429bfcdcf8e1810275806be6826 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ua917a429bfcdcf8e1810275806be6826 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ua917a429bfcdcf8e1810275806be6826 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ua917a429bfcdcf8e1810275806be6826:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ua917a429bfcdcf8e1810275806be6826 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ua917a429bfcdcf8e1810275806be6826 .ua917a429bfcdcf8e1810275806be6826-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ua917a429bfcdcf8e1810275806be6826:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: A Pair Of Silk Stockings EssayDeveloping Actionable Intelligence Develop actionable menace intelligence. Intelligence here doesn’t mean merely mixture of informations and glorious indexs, it s non refering merely menace intelligence provenders. It’s refering deducing important penetrations from assortment of beginnings. These beginnings is internal every bit good as external. The word unfair suggests that one thing that s helpful to an organisation. Organizations need to develop bigger adulthood in information assemblage and processing installations in order that will they ll leverage mechanization to bring on pregnant information. Two elements, expertness based largely larning and situational consciousness will ease organisations to develop and travel to period of clip intelligence based theoretical account. Experience Based Learning Organizations can larn from past experiences – both their experiences and experiences at the industry degree. Some organisations can even take away some lessons from occurrences in other industries like Defense, Retail, and Finance etc. These can assist them deploy new techniques and controls to support against new menaces. These lessons include some of the of import inquiries: Who are the aggressors? What is the motivation behind the onslaught? What is the defect in the system? Is it the attacker’s sophisticated technique or a exposure in the system? Were there any similar onslaughts in the yesteryear? How can the exposure be fixed? How are organisations covering with such sort of onslaughts? What can be the pro-active steps that can be taken for bar from an onslaught? Organizations need to go a learning organisation where learn from their past experiences and learn from others experiences by sharing information to both private and public companies. This will so assist organisations develop capablenesss to forestall and observe and react to cyber-attacks. Constructing a Menace Intelligence Community First, construct a community to portion informations and maintain yourself up-to-date. With a web of people collaboratively bring forthing distributed intelligence, the procedure of fusing, analysing, and leveraging Threat Intelligence can be immensely improved: Physique: Connect with other stakeholders who are sing the same job as you Contribute: Share evaluations, assurance, and attributes around informations and groups of related informations to obtain penetrations that would non be otherwise obvious Leverage: Path and step the menace to efficaciously joint the job to determination shapers. Identify adversary tendencies to preemptively deploy sensing signatures before you are targeted Figure 2: Community Watch Decision Organizations that leverage their menace intelligence capablenesss will be able to develop and transform their cyber security capablenesss to be able to observe and react to cyber-attacks. I conclude the study by stating that organisations should non execute intelligence for merely the interest of it, this should be aligned to the concern results and adjusted based on the alterations made. Menace intelligence providesinsight and context to better determination making.The hazard of bad intelligence is high.Bad determinations can easy be made frompoor intelligence- potentially making more harm than good. Good analytic patterns improve analysis thereby diminishing the hazard of hapless intelligence. You could hold the best package analysis accomplishments in the universe, but if you can non pass on your decisions efficaciously to those who need to move on your information those accomplishments are efficaciously useless in menace intelligence. Mentions hypertext transfer protocol: //www.secureworks.com/cyber-threat-intelligence/CTU_intelligence/ hypertext transfer protocol: //www.darkreading.com/threat-intelligence.asp hypertext transfer protocol: //www.sans.org/event/sans-cyber-threat-intelligence-summit Pankaj Sukhadeve 13030241163 1

Understanding International Relations Essays

Understanding International Relations Essays Understanding International Relations Essay Understanding International Relations Essay Additionally, globalisation has not been experienced everywhere to the same extent. In fact, it is probably only applicable to a small percentage of humankind. For instance, only a small minority of the worlds population can connect to the WWW and most people probably never even made a telephone phone call in their lives. Phenomenon such as electronic mail has been mainly concentrated in the so-called North of the world. It could even be argued that globalisation only applies to the developed world. It is very easy to overestimate the scope of globalisation.In the famous book World On Fire by Amy Chua, she notes that in several countries, there are market-dominant minorities- small ethnic groups which control the wealth and the economy. These include the Chinese in the Philippines, the Indians in east Africa, or whites in South Africa. Too often, free market reforms in these countries simply allow the market-dominant minorities to accumulate even more wealth, widening the poverty gap. Anti-globalisation movement claims that integration leads to growing inequality within countries, with no benefits going to the poor.Some see it as the latest manifestation of Western imperialism and capitalism. The forces that are being globalised are conveniently those found in the Western world. Thus, globalisation creates losers, allowing the more efficient exploitation of less well-off nations, all in the name of openness. Contemporary capitalism, driven by Western countries in Europe and North America, has established rules of trade and business relations that do not serve the interests of the poorer people in the world.Ecologically, globalisation has caused phenomena such as global warming, greenhouse effect, ozone depletion and a decline in Earths biological diversity. Rises in carbon dioxide emissions caused mainly by industry is expected to rise ten per cent every twenty years. This owes largely to globalisation. If it indeed does make lives better, how can one explain for the widespread poverty that still exist today? The per-capita income in the richest twenty countries is 37 times greater than that in the 20 poorest7. Accordingly, globalisation cannot, and does not, serve interests of all countries in the world.To conclude, globalization refers to a process in which the world is in many respects becoming a single place. It has in one way or another encompassed every sphere of social life. It brings people together as well as promoting higher economic growth and lower cost goods and provides much wider opportunities and choices at the same time. The advocates say globalization brings the first real chance of prosperity to the impoverished corners of the world whilst the opponents say globalization is the cause of growing poverty and inequality on the planet.However, globalization definitely is not a panacea. It does not hold the answer to universal equality, prosperity, peace and freedom as some had presumed. Poverty is still rampant in the contemporary globalizing world. Human-induced ecological degradation has never been worse. Numerous major armed conflicts were underway and globalization has not provided a formula for increased democracy either. Yet, it lowers costs, broadens choices, delivers more capital and opens more markets, giving the individual more power to control his or her destiny.As the Asian economies demonstrate, globalization can build economies through trade and investment and spur development in even the worlds poorest nations, but it can also bring economies down overnight. Namely, used properly it can be used to massively reduce poverty worldwide and to reduce global inequality. In this light, it seems that globalization itself is neither good nor bad. However, used properly it can bring about many benefits; used hastily it can seriously damage an economy. It must be seen as something to mold, shape and manage. The reality is that globalization is here to stay whether we like it or not.With 1. 2 billion people still living below the poverty line, the foremost challenge is to encourage greater global cooperation in order to provide g collaboration and coalitions to handle the risks emerging from this connected world. There is a need to balance local forces with international forces. A country must carefully choose a combination of policies that best enables it to take the opportunity while avoiding the pitfalls.BIBLIOGRAPHYBaylis, J. and Smith, S. , (2001) The Globalization of World Politics (3rd edn), Oxford University Press Brown, C. (2001) Understanding International Relations (2nd edn), Palgrave.

Ocean Park Hong Kong Recruitment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3250 words

Ocean Park Hong Kong Recruitment - Essay Example Generally, one of the aims of this theme park is to ensure that the visitors of the island of Hong Kong would each have their own memory of their visit and/or stay at the theme park (Mehrmann, 2005). Each year, the theme park receives about four million visitors, thus contributing so much to their financial stability. It is also the leader in Education and Conservation with the following programs and titles under its belt: (1) Asia’s Standard-Bearers for Conservation, (2) The Gold Standard for Animal Husbandry, (3) Ongoing Community Outreach Program, (4) New Ocean Park Academy and, (5) Involvement in World Conservation Organizations and Education Programs. During its thirty year existence, the ocean park also witnessed an increased attendance from mainland China and is currently catering to a new generation which is often regarded as a generation with more sophistication. However, the thirty-year theme park is in need of renovations as its facilities are already ageing (Einhorn, 2005). Also, in its existence as the only theme park in Hong Kong, about 70 million visitors have paid a visit (or stayed) at this very popular theme park. But things changed as the monopoly of the ocean park with regard to its share of visitors in the Hong Kong Island and its attractions has been threatened with the rise of competitors. These included the opening of Disneyland in 2005, the Tung Chung Cable Car in 2006, the Hong Kong Wetland in 2005, the growth of the Macao entertainment industry (Mehrmann, 2005). This is why, Mehrmann (2005), the Central Executive Officer of the Hong Kong Ocean Park mentioned the following as the things needed for them to stay alive and keep up with the new players in the midst of a tighter competition with newer theme parks and other attractions in the region: (1) continue to attract more people to the park, (2) develop a value proposition that is relevant to Hong Kong, (3) rediscover themselves and their true identity, (4) energize their stake holders: the government, suppliers, guests and of course, their employees, and finally, (5) to attract, retain and develop the right talent.  Ã‚  

An economic analysis of hanger film movie Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

An economic analysis of hanger film movie - Essay Example The movie that is of interest in this case is entitled Hunger Games. It is a movie produced by Gary Ross and was released in March 2012. With this particular movie in perspective the issues that are to be looked at revolve around the production budget, the expenses incurred thereafter, sat in marketing together with the revenue that is generated upon its release and thereafter. The estimated budget for the production of the movie was in the region of $78 million. Quite a large budget it was but the fact that the global reception of the movie was not a letdown is something worth writing home about. A movie is considered a success in economic terms if the revenue generated from its sales in cinemas and individuals surpasses the breakeven point to the extent that the revenue gotten from sales is able to cover all the expenses incurred in the development and at the same time generate a profit. The revenue that was generated from the movie puts the movie in the same league as some of the mentionable movies that have been produced over the years. Upon the first weekend after its release, the movie was able to rake in a total of $152.5 million dollars in the U.S. alone. This was just but the United States only. Further afield in a country like Denmark the movie was able to rake in close to $4.5 million. These figures are only in relation to the showing of the movie in theatres and does not necessarily reflect the actual amount that is to be realized after considering even the individual purchases. What this points out is that the reception of the movie on a global level was quite positive. So far in the U.S. alone the movie has had a gross domestic total of close to $340 million dollars. The financial statistics also speak a lot about the movie. The fact that it has been able to topple the list when put side by side with other big movies such as Titanic in 3-D is something quite commendable. In the weekend of 14th April 2012 the

Machiavelli And Friedrich | A comparison

Machiavelli And Friedrich | A comparison It is interesting to note that Niccolo Machiavelli (1469-1527) and Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) share a great deal of similarity, so that in fact, both have at one time been referred by the clergy of their times as the herald of the antichrist. Nevertheless, the similarity that exists between the two is mainly underpinned by their philosophical standpoints, given that Machiavellis and Nietzsches philosophical postulations were characterized by their antithetical standpoints towards Christian values, ethics and doctrines. Particularly, a case in point is Machiavellis maxim that the end justifies the means. In his II Principe, Machiavelli sees man as a political animal, but not because of mans gregarious tendencies as seen by Aristotle. To Machiavelli, man is a political animal in that in the quest for power, he has to act swiftly and be very cunning. Therefore, this brings in the concepts of competition which ensures that only those who are really determined and enthusiastic on whatever they are doing are able to keep up with the stiff competition. The divergence between Machiavelli and Christianity is further widened when he maintains that to seize and consolidate political power, it is necessary for the prince to move faster than his real and perceived enemies and crush them. The rationale behind this standpoint is that the person who moves fast and first emerges the victor, whereas the slow paced are victims (Machiavelli, 175). The similarity between the above standpoint and Nietzsches ideas is that both advocate against Christian ethics such as modesty and justice. Similarly, both disagree with the very fundamentals of Christian ethic as they both see man as an animal, whereas Christianity sees man as the most important being, with this importance being underpinned by rationality and morality. Therefore, the concept of seeing human being an important being they are regarded as civilized and are not intended to act like animals such as being not thoughtful. The main difference between human beings and animals is that human beings have conscious and are able to think and reason out in whatever they do unlike animals. Nevertheless, Nietzsches animal instincts of man is covertly mentioned, as he only refers to it, by critiquing Christianity for shutting its doors on pleasure, self, the natural and appetitive elements of man. In so assuming their controversial standpoints, both Machiavelli and Nietzsche postulate that the need to act towards self preservation, self actualization and self aggrandizement is paramount. This relegates man into likeness with the animal kingdom, given that the animal kingdom is merely driven by the need for self preservation, through instincts. As it were, the place for rationality in lieu of pure pleasure and self seeking is not given a big berth by both Nietzsche and Machiavelli. This is well proven by the fact that Machiavelli casts aspersion on the importance of values such as trust and mutual respect or agreement. Machiavelli argues that after fatally closing in on political enemies, the Prince must later on turn to his friends and eliminate them, since friends as confidants will have accrued a lot of political and administrative secrets adequate to turn against the Prince. However, it is important to take note of the fact that Nietzsche and Machiavelli had somewhat different reasons for assuming their controversial standpoints. While Nietzsche maintained his standpoint on the account that he saw Christianity a curse and God as being dead [non-existent] as the basis of his standpoint, Machiavellis concern was not concerned with atheism, theism or the concern over the existence of a deity. Machiavelli did not write his radical standpoint for the sake of dethroning Christianity, unlike Nietzsche. In respect to the above development, as a matter of fact, by conjoining ethics to Christianity, and criticizing Christianity for its moralist stands and its shunning of pleasure, debauchery and self seeking, Nietzsche basically made a dereliction on the importance of ethics and morality as important constructs that hold the society together. It is at the same time, this juncture that Machiavelli and Nietzsche part ways, as far as their philosophical standpoints are concerned. Despite his radical political standpoints Machiavelli sees the need for tampering political administration and rule with some elements of ethics. This standpoint is seen explicitly when Machiavelli urges the Prince to always make sure that he did not amass wealth and affluence by rapine. Similarly, Machiavelli argued that in order that the Prince realizes a peaceful and stable administration, it is important that he stayed away from mens women and wives. To Machiavelli, the failure to steer clear of mens wives and the failure to shun the temptation of wealth acquisition through larceny are the very factors that would drive men into vengeful tendencies and thereby sparking off a political resistance, and subsequently, instability. To any one analyst or careful reader, this is indeed a moralist standpoint. So moralist it is that many a world leader has not been able to keep. This is not the case with Nietzsche. In almost the same vein, Machiavelli does not see religion as being retrogressive or disposable to the domains under the Prince. As a matter of fact, Machiavelli reiterates to the need by the Prince, to desist from interfering with the Church and religious matters. To Machiavelli, the failure to do so would warrant the loathing by the masses. As a corollary to this standpoint, Machiavelli advised the Prince on the need to acquaint himself with the clergy, so as to be able to rule effectively. However, it must be remembered that Machiavelli advised the Prince on the need to ensure that the Church remained under the control of the state, since the Church existed under the auspices of his domains, and the Prince ought to know the developments taking place within his jurisdiction. On the other hand, Nietzsche in his condescending criticism against the Christian religion or faith, becomes blinded to the point of disposing off, any need for morality, ethics and self restraint. To him, the fact that God is dead has given man the liberty to indulge himself. This is the fatal mistake of Nietzsches works (Nietzsche and Mencken, 139). Conclusion There is no civilization that can exist in the absolute absence of ethics. In the same vein, it is not tenable, the idea of governance and administration of a people who have a totally laissez faire condition to do as they please. The veracity of this concept is well established by the law which seeks to control and ward off the excesses of man. Nietzsche fails to realize that removing the concept of absolute authority to which all are accountable is to issue a blank check on mans actions. On the other hand, handing man absolute rights will make life intractable, given that in seeking to exercise these absolute rights, the rights of others and the authority of the state to exercise its powers will have been compromised. In summation, it is important to realize that the main difference that lay in Machiavellis and Nietzsches works was that of purpose. While Machiavelli only sought to advise the Prince on the technicalities of politics, Nietzsche mainly sought to produce an atheistic t reatise.

Analysis Of Multidisciplinary Counter Intelligence Essay -- essays res

The United States today is becoming more and more dependant upon technological developments to gather intelligence. The â€Å"secret agents† of yesterday are very close to being obsolete. With technology becoming the prime source of intelligence gathering, there is an assumption that other countries are gathering intelligence in similar ways. The only way to combat intelligence gathering against the United States is to know what technological intelligence collection resources are being used for gathering information. This is the job of Multidisciplinary Counterintelligence (MDCI). How does the government know that lines are secure from signals intelligence of foreign adversaries? One of the main tasks of MDCI is the â€Å"communication line† of the American Government. Radio waves can easily be detected with the right equipment anywhere within the area, and even microwaves can be detected with a receiver in the right place. MDCI combats these problems with encryption for messages and secure lines for voice communication. The encryption process is found on the governments SIPRnet web, which is used for the transfer of classified information only. For voice communications, the government uses secured lines that will scramble communications into meaningless sounds or scratches. The only problem with these types of devices is that they cannot be located just anywhere and can be very expensive to maintain; furthermore, facilities must be able to support these classified mediums. With all o...

Chess vs Human

It is hard to distinguish between that that is better in chess Human or Artificial Intelligence. Some would say humans because of their critical thinking and throwing computer off guard. And others would say artificial intelligence like Deep Blue because of its capability to calculate upto 4,000,000 chess moves per second as compare to human chess player who could only calculate upto three moves in a second. But in my opinion I think human has the upper hand. Human plays better chess than Artificial Intelligence. We know that presently computers can only use the intelligence that is load in it.It is not capable of thinking anything else as human minds can do so. All the moves that computer make are based on the series of calculations and this all based on the positions of the pieces on the chessboard. A computer chess program like Deep Blue makes its move by using its evaluation function. The evaluation function is an algorithm that measures the chess position. Positions with positiv e values are good for ‘White’ and positions with negative values are good for ‘Black’ (IBM Research – Deep Blue – Overview).Here is where I think that human has the upper hand while playing chess with an artificial intelligence. Human chess players use their skills, judgment and previous experiences to decide about the moves they are going to make next (Connor, 1993). And artificial intelligence moves are based on its algorithms and so a human chess player can disturb its algorithms making an unusual move that artificial intelligence does not recognize. In 1996, Gary Kasparov beat Deep Blue by 4-2 in a â€Å"regulation-style match† held in Philadelphia.Although Gary Kasparov lost the opening game to Deep Blue but he came game back and won the game 2. â€Å"Gary Kasparov won in an interesting ending, though due to programming errors the computer in that game played without any opening database. Two draws followed. Kasparov's second win came in Game 5 after the IBM programmers refused a draw offer even though Deep Blue considered the position roughly equal. In this game, Deep Blue demonstrated its lack of understanding of the danger of a kingside pawn majority.In Game 6, Kasparov totally outplayed Deep Blue by gaining a ecisive space advantage and by avoiding any weaknesses. In this game, Kasparov trapped the computer's rook and bishop, in part because the IBM programmers had never properly adjusted a parameter that signals when bishops are trapped† (Lesson 4: Deep Blue vs. Kasparov). Here a human player skills, experience and critical thinking helped him to win the match against artificial intelligence. Also it also shows that artificial intelligence has flaws in its. And how can it not have flaws. Artificial intelligence is created by us ‘Humans’. And we are not the perfect being on this planet.So how could we create something that is better or at our level in every circumstance of the life? We could not. We tried cloning and we failed in it to. So how could we create an artificial intelligence that is by no means different from us? We are not God, so we could not create anything like what He has created. â€Å"Although Man has done a pretty good job in creating his own complexities here on Earth, they're still nowhere near what Nature has done on her own†(Artificial intelligence vs. Human intelligence). Furthermore, the human brain has the capacity to do anything.Its possibilities are endless, which is why the imagination is so powerful. And computers lack the traits of humans; they are tools for our use and are limited physically. Computer cannot do anything on its own. Series of arguments and methods are inserted in it in order to preform an action. â€Å"But humans have the capacity to store information indefinitely, seeing as how we cannot be rebooted or turned off/on†(Intelligence: Artificial vs. Human). Also â€Å"The human brain is the most complex part of the human body if not the most complex subject known to human kind.Although a computer may work on a complicated series of circuits and processors it is a relatively simple item to understand in comparison to the human brain. So many important functions of the brain is beyond our understanding and has un-quantifiable properties† (Artificial Intelligence). Thus a simple program, which uses artificial intelligence by no means, is capable of beating a complex human brain. Another important point is that Howard’s mentioned is that intelligence suddenly changed in the last 30 years, while several putative causal factors had been present since 1920, such as the fact that chess became a popular sport, many illions played.Also chess participation rate was very high, chess was taught in schools and factories, and was identified early and given special training, sizeable government salaries, and overseas travel. Howard’s reasoning is that if these factors, rather t han rising general intelligence, were the explanation for the decreasing age of younger chess top players after 1970 (Howard 1999). Its would not be reasonable to say that humans minds have no limits to its critical thinking but it has the power to make the correct decision while the artificial intelligence may not be capable of doing that.All the artificial intelligence has is memory and the programs that are in it to perform the action. It cannot think on its own. It works on the algorithms and as soon as it is disturbed, artificial intelligence gets confused and makes the wrong moves. But a human chess player if in the same situation can make the right move that is need using his critical thinking, which is why I think that human play better chess than artificial intelligence.